Editorial analysis could have been a bit more profound in outlook.

Illustrations/examples, wherever possible, adds to the charm of your answers.

More of logical coherence and sequencing, with focus on spelling and syntax, helps enliven your answers.

Marks: 62/100

Logical sequencing of ideas and structured/balanced views help in presenting a good answer.

Could have concentrated a bit more on neatness and on a few spelling mistakes that are interspersed within the answers.

Marks: 64/100

Coherent structuring and logical sequencing would have helped a lot in writing a well-planned answer.

Subject-verb concord, typography and spelling need special attention.

Marks: 58/100

Logical coherence and sequencing of ideas both within sentences and within paragraphs, with proper illustrations at places, helps spicing up your answers.

Comments can be more critical, with in-depth analysis.

Marks: 68/100

Logical sequencing of ideas within paragraphs, coherence within sentences, and proper use of syntax helps in enlivening your answers.

Neat presentations always have their own value. Focus on tense concord and spelling helps a lot.

Marks: 48/100

The Editorial analysis needs a bit more in depth commentary. Concentration on spelling and syntax aids in enlivening your answers.

Logical coherence would have helped in giving a structured and well-sequenced essay.

Marks: 68/100

More focus on typography and illustrations at places, would have enhanced the appeal of your answers.

The question on 'functions of language' could have been a bit more textual in presentation.

Marks: 72/100

Functions of language are too broad in outlook that they could not come up to meet textual parameters.

More of critical focus/in-depth (especially in the Editorial analysis) comments would have been an added advantage.

Marks: 52/100

Logical sequencing and coherence within ideas in sentences and paragraphs helps enliven your answers.

Focus on syntax, spelling and grammar would have made the difference.

In-depth critical focus/comments would have been be a weightage in terms of marks.

Marks: 62/100

Additional focus on the Editorial page, and illustrations (at places) would have served to spice up your presentations.

Marks: 64/100

A little more of insight and focus on the Editorial page, and illustrations/examples, would have served to highlight your presentations well.

Marks: 70/100

Critical, indepth commentaries would have served to give a better focus to your presentations.

Coherence and illustrations, would have been an added advantage.

Marks: 54/100

Functions of language needs a bit of textual significance too. Illustrations would have added to the charm of the presentations.

Indepth commentaries with a critical bent of mind would have been an advantage.

Marks: 66/100

Added illustrations and examples, wherever possible, would help in enlivening the essays.

Marks: 72/100

Focussed comments, in-depth critical perspectives, coherence between sentences, syntax structure, help in enhancing your presentations.

Spelling and vocabulary need additional attention.

Marks: 52/100

Concentrate on your syntax, coherence between sentences, spelling, typography and tense coordination.

Critical commentaries need a bit more of depth.

Marks: 56/100

'Functions of Language' are very broad in outlook. Being textual helps. A bit more of depth in comments/critical views add to the enlivening of your essays.

Marks: 60/100

Good perspective/insights. Kudos. A bit more of depth and coherence in commentaries would help in enhancing the appeal of your essays. [SCRIBE]

Marks: 76/100

Improve your sentence structure, logical coherence, and vocabulary for better essays.

More depth in commentaries/critical views will be an added advantage.

Marks: 40/100

A bit more of elaborate illustrations would add to the charm of your presentation.

Marks: 72/100

More illustrations, topical allusions and coherence between ideas would spice up your presentations.

Sometimes, careless spelling mistakes and typographical errors creep in, which can be avoided.

Marks: 72/100

I CIA - I MA Marks - Reg..:

Dear Students of I MA English,

Your I CIA Marks for the Paper on 'The English Language' are being uploaded on our related academic blog HERE.

For a commentary and topical analysis of your answer sheets, along with your marks, CLICK HERE.

King Whitney once famously remarked that Change has a considerable psychological impact on the human mind. To the fearful it is threatening because it means that things may get worse. To the hopeful it is encouraging because things may get better. To the confident it is inspiring because the challenge exists to make things better.

So, for a change, and for once, your names have not found a place in the mark statement at all. It's up to you to identify your handwriting and thereby your marks. All the best.!

Regards,
Rufus

Functions of language is more broad in scope and could have been more textual - with illustrations, examples and topical allusions.

Coherence - connectivity - between sentences and paragraphs would have added to the charm of the presentation.

Marks: 62/100

A bit more of depth in analysing the editorials, enhances your presentation lots.

Illustrations, topical quotations, examples can be used wherever necessary, especially in the 'Functions of language' to add spice to your essay.

Marks: 66/100

Concentrate more on your spelling, syntax, typography, and coherence/coordination between sentences.

Improving on your verbs and having more of a critical focus helps in presenting a good essay.

'Functions of Language' lacks the scope and illustrations.

Marks: 40/100

A little more of depth in your comments would enhance your presentations.

'Functions of language' are more broad in perspective, and being textual helps.

Concentrate on typography, avoid elliptical (shortened) writing, and also try to come down on your spelling mistakes at one or two places.

Marks: 62/100

Concentrating more on syntax, sequencing, connecting ideas in a coherent/logical way helps enhance your essays.

Take note of the few typographical errors that have seeped into your essay.

Analysis of the Editorial could have been a bit more comprehensive/elaborate.

Use illustrations/examples for 'functions of language' for a more authentic presentation.

Marks: 56/100

Comments could have been more critical, with proper sequencing between ideas.

Using new paragraphs for giving new ideas/thoughts augurs well for the essay.

For 'Functions of Language,' more illustrations/examples would have authenticated, fine-tuned your essay better.

Marks: 60/100

Concentrate on spelling, focussing more on critical presentation, and clarity of purpose.

The functions of language are very shallow in structure, and could have been more textual. (David Crystal's point of view)

Always try adding illustrations/examples to spice up your essay, as they always stand your essay in better stead.

Marks: 56/100

Use of proper nomenclature and ilustrations (examples) enhances the scope of your essay.

Concentrate on improving your language, spelling and typography errors.

Tense concord and avoidance of elliptical (shortened form) writing would be an advantage.

Marks: 64/100

The question 'Comment on the quality and content of the Editorial page in any two English dailies' requires a bit more of elaboration. You have the potential to improve on your writing skills.

For the question on functions of language, a bit more of illustrations would have added to the essence of your essay.

Marks: 62/100

Editorial analysis could have been a bit more focussed and elaborate.

Functions of language were quite broad in scope - should have been more text-based.

Marks: 60/100

Analysis of the Editorial page could have been a bit more elaborate and critical.

Marks: 58/100