Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Book Review: The Hunger Games

LIFE? OR HONOUR?

“The Hunger Games” is a dystopian science fiction novel and the first book in the Hunger Games trilogy written by Suzanne Collins.

The novel is set in the wake of a second Civil War in America, which has been divided into twelve Districts, parts of a nation called Panem. Panem is ruled by the Elite residents of the Capitol, a centrally located area which is responsible for maintaining order. To show their loyalty to the Capitol, every year each of the twelve Districts must send two Tributes – one male, one female – to compete in the national Hunger Games. The Hunger Games is a gladiatorial competition in which twenty four young people fight to the death, until only one of them remains. The winner’s District is rewarded with food and other scarce items.

Katniss Everdeen from District 12 volunteers for the Games in place of her younger sister. She is joined by the baker’s son, Peeta, who has had feelings for her for a long time. Upon arriving at the Capitol both Katniss and Peeta are trained before being thrown into the Games arena.

It is a simple plot but Collins creates a detailed, savage world that captivates the reader. I think the first few chapters of “The Hunger Games” are a bit slow and juvenile but the story becomes exciting once the Games begin. The Hunger Games arena is described in detail but it never feels overdone. The characters, while stereotypical for the genre, are convincing in their roles.

Though Katniss is the protagonist of this novel, I like the character of Peeta. While katniss means everything to him, he also means something very important to her. In her eyes, Peeta symbolizes hope. He, after all, is the one who helped save her family from starvation by giving her loaves of bread when they were children. Peeta’s kindness probably saves the lives of Katniss and her family.

“While I’ve been ruminating on the availability of trees, Peeta has been struggling with how to maintain his identity. His purity of self.”
                                                              - Katniss on Peeta’s struggle for identity. 

Another reason why I like Peeta is that he is also one of the Tributes who wants to know what his identity means in the scope of the Hunger Games. As the Games approach, he tells Katniss that he does not just want to be a pawn in the Capitol’s game. He wants to “die as himself”. For Peeta, it is important that the Capitol knows that they do not own him. He confesses to Katniss that his only hope for the Games is to retain his identity and not to be made into a monster by his circumstances. This reveals Peeta to be a good and pensive person who values his dignity and decency above everything else.

In addition to being a thrilling action novel, “The Hunger Games” also works like a satire of the social media. Collins attacks the modern audiences’ thirst for ‘reality shows’, in ways the younger viewers will fail to appreciate. Katniss’s and peeta’s romance is the subject of so much fascination because the Game makers and the viewers think it is doomed. They become the “star-crossed lovers” and this promise of suffering adds more drama and makes it more fun for the Game makers and the viewers to watch.

Since the Hunger Games is a nationally televised event, the competitors must behave in ways that would earn them ‘sponsors.’ These sponsors can air-drop supplies like food, medicine, etc. into the arena. I feel that this entire novel is a form of irony. The novel is filled with elements like romance, children in peril, intense violence, and girl-against-all-odds.  Yet, Collins seems to be satirizing them.


Happy Hunger Games! And may the odds be ever in your favour!”
                                                                           -  Effie Trinket

I find that the slogan for the Hunger Games is very ironic. The government representative for District 12, Effie Trinket, says it after announcing the Tributes from each District and the announcers for the Games use it during interviews. The slogan is a form of verbal irony as it is clear that the odds are never in anyone’s favour. The people living in District 12 daily suffer from hunger and poverty. Even those from the wealthier Districts are forced to choose Tributes for the Games. In the best circumstances, the winner of the Games will be haunted by the bloodshed for years. The others will be killed.

“Destroying things is much easier than making them”.
                                                                          - Katniss to Rue

There is a lot of violence in this book. This is a story about children murdering other children in gladiatorial combat that makes the violence brutal and gruesome. “The Hunger Games” present the Tributes’ suffering as mass entertainment, and the more the Tributes suffer in battle with one another, the more entertaining the Games become. Katniss at various situations talks about past Games and what made them successful or unsuccessful. Katniss and Peeta are adviced to “Stay Alive”The recurring theme is that the viewers want to see the Tributes fighting one another and not dying too quickly (because then the fun is over). This is seen in Cato’s(male Tribute from District 2) slow death at the end of the novel.

The universe of the Hunger Games feels despairingly cold, and godless, in which life is truly “nasty, brutish and short”. The main characters strive to act nobly but they do so most of the time based on emotions rather than ethics. In this sense, “The Hunger Games is kind of disappointing.

As for whether the book is worth reading, I would say yes. Older teens and adults who are fans of this genre will like reading it. “The Hunger Games” is definitely one of the best written young adult novels I have read. It is exciting, intense, thought-provoking and sometimes despairing too. The book is rich in not only about governments, personal freedom, and sacrifice, but also about what it means to just be yourself and not submit to the expectations of the Society.

If I should rate this book, I would give it 4.5 stars out of 5. I like this book a lot, but not everyone will, or should.


- Hannah Chandran

II MA Crit. Theory